Sjors Witjes works in Business Administration at the Strategic Management Group. ‘I study how companies contribute to a more sustainable society and a circular economy. Increasingly more organisations are interested in what role they could play in that area. As a scientist, I’m studying how we can connect the university and the outside world. By clever collaboration, I use the knowledge of the entire university – not just about management but also about law, medicine, physics, even philosophy. I also work together with the HAN (University of Applied Science) and the ROC (Regional Education Centre).’
For five years, Bart de Bruin has been the director of Dar, the prominent waste collector and manager of public spaces in the Nijmegen region. ‘My work varies from operational to strategic issues. Operationally, the waste in the streets has to be collected and the wastebins emptied each day. If our people don’t do their job for a week, you’ll immediately see that outdoors. Strategically, we’re aiming at a circular, fresh and green living environment. Dar has an important task in this.’
A dot on the horizon
The two men see each other regularly in the Circular Council, which is chaired by De Bruin. This body stems from the municipality of Nijmegen’s Green Capital Year (2018). In this council, representatives of the government, education and the business community work together on concrete circular projects. De Bruin: ‘The dot on the circulatory horizon is clear to everyone, but no one knows the exact road there.’ Witjes: ‘All of the participants are open to taking on the challenges that we encounter along the way.’
Dar and the university work together on diverse projects. Witjes: ‘Last year we had a project about electronic waste. For example, in hospitals and universities there are still holes in the electronic cycle. They often don’t know how much electronica they have, what is being used where and where it ends up after being used. Honours Academy students made an inventory of the streams and responsibilities of the entire university. It turned out that Radboud University Medical Center is responsible for the purchase of certain electronic instruments at the university. But the university was completely unaware of this.’ De Bruin: ‘Findings like these don’t immediately lead to concrete solutions, but if you know who is responsible for what, then you can make better choices. For example, the purchasers can consciously buy only electronics that are easy to repair or that incorporate recycled plastic.’
Closing the nappy cycle
According to De Bruin, the biggest challenge in processing nappies is similar to that of other resource streams: collaboration in the chain. ‘Given their logical influence on the design of the product, manufacturers should have more intensive contact with the recyclers of their product. But my view is that the major nappy manufacturers are hardly interested in circularity; they’re mainly focused on how comfortable the nappies are to wear and, linked to this, turnover and profits.’ Witjes: ‘Some manufacturers are interested in the plastics and the energy delivered by recycling nappies. For example, BASF, which makes plastic granules for nappies, is in discussion with the ARN.’ De Bruin: ‘That’s right. And that’s an important sign, just like IKEA, which has become a co-owner of the Dutch mattress recycling plant RetourMatras. These are the first signs that the circular wheel is beginning to turn. But what makes it difficult for manufacturers is that the circular wheel often doesn’t align with the economic wheel. In other words, circularity still often costs (a lot of) money, for example because virgin raw materials are cheaper than recycled raw materials. Companies have to make their choices within that conflicting area.’
Double advantage
Sjors Witjes also works in others ways on bundling knowledge and collaboration. Last November he organised a so-called DAN-CE (Dutch Academic Network on Circular Economy) event. Tens of top researchers from universities and institutes like TNO (Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research) and the RIVM (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) as well as representatives from government bodies and the business community met one another on the campus in Nijmegen. They worked out a research proposal intended at ensuring that implementing policy in the area of the circular economy would be directly supported by scientific research. Witjes: ‘Bundling knowledge like that is enormously valuable. In the end, we’re all working on the same question: how can we as a society come a step further with respect to circularity and sustainability?’
This article is written by Machiel van Zanten and appeared earlier on Lustrum edition NSM Focus. Photo by Pawel Czerwinski on Unsplash.